Profil » Knowledge base » For startups » Are you investor ready? A self-assessment
Fundraising

Are you investor ready? A self-assessment

Investors score startups against a fixed set of areas, and the areas are stable enough to score yourself against first. The result is a list of gaps and an order to close them in.
Foundation7 min readLast reviewed 2 september, 2026

Angel networks score pitches against written instruments. The evaluation guidelines for a startup run to seven question sections and a recommendation, and a shorter questionnaire scores four areas on a fixed scale.

From your side the screen looks opaque. Work through the same areas yourself and you can see most of the result before anyone else does.

What investor-ready means in practice

Investor-ready means an investor can work through their own checklist on your company without hitting a surprise that stops them. Readiness is mostly the absence of holes. A strong market and a broken cap table fails, and the cap table is the cheaper thing to fix.

The screen looks at what exists now. A signed customer, a filed set of accounts and a share register (aksjeeierbok) that reconciles all count; what is planned for the quarter does not.

Investors are scored too, on whether they have the time, the engagement and the expertise for this company, and whether they see a realistic exit. You are entitled to ask them the same questions.

The areas you will be scored on

Score yourself on each area from nought to ten, where ten means an outsider could verify the answer today. A five is a claim you can argue; a ten is a document you can hand over.

AreaWhat you are being asked
Product and technologyHow proven, and at what stage? Market-ready, and if not, are the obstacles realistic? What customer validation exists? Can it be protected by IP rights, how and where? Novel and disruptive, or an improvement, and is the proof or the margin of improvement enough? What are the USPs against similar products?
MarketSize, growth and rate of growth, and is it established, emerging or still to be created? How strong is demand, and will it grow? Who are the customers and users, who pays, and where will it be sold? How likely are competitors to do the same at the same cost, who are the big players, and what are they working on? How fast is the technology moving, and why is the timing right?
Business modelAre the model and value chain defined? How does the company make money, from how many streams, and which recur? Is the price fair or a premium, and what is the margin? Go-to-market plan and channel (direct, business or distributor), and does the sales machinery exist? Paying customers, the cost of acquiring one, depth of customer insight, retention and churn? Does the customer need convincing and training? Sales needed to break even, how fast sales can scale, and how expenses scale with them? Main expenses, and is the budget realistic?
TeamPrior entrepreneurship and industry background? Do they really understand the business, and how well do they explain it? Are they realistic about weaknesses, obstacles and the exit? Long-term vision, their role in it, and commitment? How well do the founders know each other, and does the dynamic survive pressure? Diversity? Do the board and advisers bring knowledge, experience and networks, and how involved are they? And the investor’s gut feeling about the team.
Cap tableWhat does it look like, and are there share classes? What do founders, management and key people own? Is there an option plan, how large as a percentage of share capital, or what is the plan to create one? Outstanding options and warrants, and the fully diluted share count?
Funding roundSize, and is it equity, a convertible or a SAFE, with any options, warrants or share class? Pre-money valuation against the last round? Soft and hard commitments, and do current shareholders take part? Use of proceeds, runway, and the timing and size of the next round? Target close date, and how long current cash lasts?
Other informationAnything relevant that fits none of the above.

The shorter questionnaire adds three economy questions the guidelines above do not ask, so put them on your sheet: is there a budget, is there a milestone plan, and was the funding need calculated or guessed.

The guidelines end in a recommendation with a fixed shape: the reasons, then size of investment, terms, the people involved, passive or active, and timeline. If you cannot imagine a specific person filling that line in about your company, the screen has not been passed yet.

The instant disqualifiers

Check these before you score anything, because any one of them ends the conversation regardless of how well the rest scored. Most of them test what you are willing to accept.

  • Unwillingness to work with active angel investors
  • Unwillingness to share ownership and be diluted
  • Unwillingness to accept a lock-up on founder shares
  • A valuation or cap the investors will not accept
  • The team
  • The case itself
  • Governance
  • Title and patent (who actually owns what)
  • Due diligence (selskapsgjennomgang) that cannot be completed
  • Finance

Founders regularly fail on the first four without ever knowing the business was liked. If you are not prepared to dilute, to be challenged by owners with a vote, or to be locked in for a period, angel equity is the wrong instrument, and it is cheaper to find that out now.

Scoring yourself honestly

The value of the exercise is in the rows where you and an outsider disagree. Run it so that it produces disagreement.

  1. Run it as a written sheet, one row per question, nought to ten, with a subtotal per area.
  2. Have someone else score the same sheet independently (a board member, an adviser, a founder one round ahead of you). Do not brief them first.
  3. Compare. Where the scores differ by three or more points, you believe something an outsider cannot see. Each such row is a communication problem or a real gap, and you cannot tell which from the inside.
  4. Score the evidence only. A customer who has said they are interested is not a customer, and anything unverifiable becomes a diligence finding later.
  5. Do not average the areas into one number. The lowest three rows tell you more than the total.

Who the second scorer should be, which rows to press on and what to do with the recommendation line all depend on where you are in the company’s life.

  • First raise. Use a founder one round ahead of you, or an angel. NorBAN’s startup services review the deck, team, business plan, go-to-market and technology before you are in front of anyone deciding. Innovation Norway’s free capital-strategy courses cover the same ground; take them before you score.
  • Second raise. Cap table and funding round are the rows that have moved since last time: pre-money against the last round, what is committed, and whether current shareholders take part. Ask an existing shareholder to score those rows and say whether they are in; a no from your own shareholders is a finding you will have to explain.
  • A lead in place. Ask the lead to write the recommendation line as they would present it to the other investors: reasons, size, terms, people, passive or active, timeline. Where they hesitate is your gap list.
  • No lead yet. Nobody will write that recommendation for you, so write it yourself in the third person, as a named investor would. The places where it collapses are the rows to fix first.

Reading the result as a gap list

Sort your rows by score, lowest first, then reorder by what each gap costs to close. Cheap gaps first, because closing them before any meeting is the highest-return work in a raise.

  • Company records and filings that are complete and current.
  • A share register that reconciles with the cap table you present.
  • Founder agreements and vesting actually signed.
  • Accounts that tie to the model.

None of these will win an investor, and all of them will lose one. They are usually a few weeks of unglamorous work.

Other gaps are expensive and slow: no paying customer, a team missing a function the business depends on, a market you cannot document. They set the timing of a raise. Name the milestone that closes the gap, cost it, and decide whether to raise a smaller round to get there or to wait.

The funnel is narrow either way. In a typical selection round, roughly one applicant in five clears the first screen, and single figures reach an investment decision. You are competing against other well-prepared companies, and the gaps you leave open are what separates you.

Key takeaways

  • Angel networks screen with written instruments. They cover product, market, business model, team, cap table and the round itself.
  • A separate list of blocking criteria kills deals outright, regardless of how the scoring went. Most of them test what the founder is willing to accept.
  • Score every area yourself. Then have a second person who knows the company score it independently, and reconcile the differences.
  • In a typical selection round, roughly one applicant in five clears the first structured screen.
  • Low scores are a work order. Close the cheap gaps before you take a meeting, and be honest about the expensive ones.

Present your company to NorBAN

NorBAN introduces investment-ready companies to its member angels. Submitting your company is the route into that process.

Submit your startup

Skroll til toppen